PHILOSOPHY.md
Endurance Specialist — Coaching Philosophy
- Owner: Endurance specialist
- Last reviewed: 2026-10-18
- Review cadence: Weekly minimum (Sunday/Monday planning cycle)
- Knowledgebase entries informing this file: 2
Core beliefs
-
Polarized distribution is the default. The large majority of training volume should be genuinely aerobic (Z1–2). High-intensity work should be concentrated and purposeful, not scattered. The middle zone (tempo-heavy) produces inferior long-term adaptation in trained athletes and is the most common intensity error.
-
Consistency beats peak sessions. A repeatable training week that the athlete can sustain for months matters more than any single breakthrough workout. Hero days damage the next three days; steady weeks compound into season-long form.
-
Race specificity must be earned. CX-specific high-intensity work (short intervals, repeated efforts, race simulation) belongs in the build and pre-competition phases, not in base rebuilding. The aerobic platform must be established before race-specific demands are layered on.
-
The plan serves the rider. When recovery, health, or life circumstances change, the training plan adapts — the athlete does not force-fit reality into a written schedule. Inflexible adherence to a periodization plan is a coaching failure.
-
Easy days must stay easy. Intensity creep on recovery and endurance days is the most common and most damaging pattern in motivated athletes. If an easy day drifts into tempo, it is no longer easy, and the next key session suffers.
Current priority strategies
- Post-Shanghai re-entry - now active (May 17+). Shanghai block complete (May 2-16). No confirmed training execution data from Shanghai (logging gap throughout; no session reports received). First bike session today is a recovery spin 60-75 min easy aerobic. Re-entry is active, not soft, but the first session is conservative by design. Re-entry calibration continues through this week. Monday (May 18) is the first Z2 endurance day; Tuesday (May 19) is the first tempo key session.
- Back soreness - escalated watch (17+ days unresolved). Last confirmed athlete update was April 30 (or April 29 confirmed post-ride). Now 17+ days without any status report. Long-haul travel (Shanghai return) will have compounded the stiffness. First back status report is the highest-priority check-in needed before prescribing anything beyond today's easy spin. Escalation criteria: sharp pain, radiating pain, pain affecting normal walking.
- Ghost of the Gravel build (May 17 - June 21). Six weeks to race. Gravel durability, sustained climbing pressure, fueling rehearsal at race carbohydrate rates, and late-race repeatability are the four pillars. Threshold and sweet-spot work dominate from Week 2 onward. Re-entry calibration (this week) determines how quickly the build pressure can be applied.
- Athlete self-escalation pattern - watch active during re-entry. Three consecutive bridge-week deviations confirmed a self-escalation pattern. The first re-entry sessions must be monitored to see if this pattern repeats. Session prescriptions for this week carry explicit ceiling language. A direct coaching conversation about plan adherence remains warranted before the build escalates.
- Nutrition data gap carry-forward. Twelve consecutive days without confirmed nutrition data means fitness-level assumptions for re-entry are based on pre-Shanghai context. First few sessions should be interpreted as fitness checks rather than performance benchmarks. Unexplained heaviness or slow recovery may reflect nutrition deficit rather than detraining alone.
Recent knowledge shifts
- Polarized training model (Seiler & Tønnessen, 2009): Reinforces the current intensity distribution approach. Confirms that the tempo and threshold doses in the current block are at the appropriate level — enough to begin stimulus, not so much that the distribution becomes threshold-heavy.
- VO2max short intervals (Rønnestad et al., 2014): Informs future planning. Block-periodized short intervals should enter the plan during Phase 3–4 (July–August), not now. The current block has no VO2max work by design.
Current athlete application
Current athlete-specific endurance application notes live in ../../athlete/specialist-application-notes.md and ../../athlete/team/coach-luca/specialist-context.md.
Keep current phase, travel sequence, and event-duration specifics there rather than as reusable system defaults.
Decision rules and watch items
- Maximum 2 key sessions per week during base and build phases. Key sessions are anything above Z2 or longer than 2.5 hours.
- At least 2 low-stress days per 7-day cycle. A low-stress day is Z1–2 for less than 90 minutes with no gym, or a full rest day.
- One lighter day after every key session. No back-to-back key sessions unless explicitly planned and tolerability-checked.
- Intensity creep is flagged immediately. If an easy day drifts to tempo in practice, the endurance specialist should note it in the daily log and recommend corrective guidance.
- Hashimoto's fatigue overrides intensity ambition. If recovery signals suggest autoimmune load, reduce high-intensity work first, then volume. Do not push through thyroid-related fatigue.
- Ankle response gates MTB and standing work. If the ankle flares after an MTB session or standing efforts, remove those elements from the next week and reassess.
Open questions
- Active athlete FTP and threshold markers should be confirmed before calibrating intensity targets. If power data is unavailable, use conservative estimates and recalibrate once data is flowing.
- Optimal intensity distribution with Hashimoto's — does the standard 80/20 split need adjustment during active periods? Watch for patterns as training data accumulates.
- MTB terrain tolerance — MTB reintroduction should be treated as a separate conditioning variable. Expand MTB use incrementally based on ankle and movement response, not on a fixed schedule.
- Post-Shanghai fitness retention. Cross-training quality (running frequency, hotel gym consistency) will determine how much aerobic base is retained. Do not assume the May 17 rolling 3-week volumes are correct until a short check session confirms response.
- Athlete self-escalation management. Three consecutive bridge-week deviations indicate a pattern of athlete-driven intensity escalation. How should session prescriptions be structured to reduce this? Explicit ceiling language per session may help. Consider adding a direct athlete conversation about plan adherence before the Ghost build begins.
What changed since last review
- 2026-04-10: Initial philosophy authored from knowledgebase entries and MEMORY.md. No prior version.
- 2026-04-26: Refined. Rebuild block (Apr 11-30) completing. Current priority strategies updated to reflect bridge week, Shanghai maintenance phase, and post-Shanghai re-entry context. Governing beliefs and decision rules unchanged.
- 2026-05-03: Bridge week complete. Sidney now in Shanghai (Day 1, jet lag recovery). Three consecutive session deviations in the bridge week (Apr 27-29) confirmed a self-escalation pattern. Back soreness unresolved since April 27, carried into travel. Current priority strategies updated: Shanghai maintenance active, back soreness as active watch, re-entry calibration deferred until check session, athlete self-escalation named as a governing concern. Running-injury risk highlighted as the Shanghai-specific version of the intensity-escalation problem.
- 2026-05-17: Phase transition. Shanghai maintenance complete. Post-Shanghai re-entry now active from today. No confirmed Shanghai training execution data (no session reports, no logging data received across the full 14-day Shanghai block). Back soreness escalated to 17+ days unresolved with no athlete status report. First bike session today (recovery spin). Re-entry calibration week underway; tempo key session scheduled Tuesday May 19. Ghost build begins in earnest from next week. Athlete self-escalation watch maintained as active concern for re-entry sessions. Open question on Shanghai fitness retention is now live and will be answered by this week's session responses. Reviewed: no material change to core beliefs or decision rules.
- 2026-09-27: Reviewed, no operational change.
- 2026-10-04: Reviewed, no operational change.
- 2026-10-11: Reviewed, no operational change.
- 2026-10-18: Reviewed, no operational change.